Images descreened with this are much, much sharper than images descreened with blur. If you also need to export a higher resoltion image (for tagging your digital audio files etc), this plugin produces incredible results: Descreening will work best with such a high resolution.Īs discogs images are so small, descreening with blur will usually do the trick. The point of the "free" version is to check out if it works with your scanner before you buy the software.Ī 600dpi scan will usually capture the print raster perfectly, so there will not be any additional moire. alarmclockscreamsīut if it adds a watermark then it's pretty much useless for Discogs right? Use the free version (it adds water-marks) to see what limits your scanner has. (Hey, and that was considered pretty "fast" back in 2001!) So no descreening and no sharpener at 96 ppi and a page is scanned in a matter of seconds. Scanning and descreening a full color page at 200 ppi might take a few minutes. That's what I do on the said old Epson 1240 as well: it's got a pretty good built in descreen function but it's painfully slow. You can still sharpen later in your image editor. If your scanner cannot descreen, use a blur effect in an image editor.Īlso, scanning at, say, 150 ppi or lower while turning off any sharpeners (unsharp mask etc.) actually might kinda descreen all by itself. There are red horozontal lines that are not present on the real artwork edovan However, when scanning LP sleeves for sale in my studio where I've only got a relatively slow 20 (!) years old Epson Perfection 1240 scanner, I go as low as 96 ppi to proceed faster – which is still good enough for Discogs. The highest resolution I'm scanning for Discogs is 200 ppi which gives a "nice" size of 800×800 px for vinyl labels.Īlso, with 200 ppi I get precise results when auto-stitching four LP sleeve parts in Photoshop. … is a pointless waste of time, storage and resources in general unless you want to print a counterfeit. The previously-uploaded scan/picture, while obviously cropped way too much, actually has much more accurate colors: Evolution If you look at the images on this submission and click Edit Images, you can compare my newer scan with the scan that was previously uploaded (but now disabled). My scans are usually not this far off, but this one stood out to me more than any other scan I've done has before. There are limited Image Correction option to choose from: Brightness, Tint, Temperature, and SaturationĪlso I just did another scan for a different CD's cover art, and the artwork was supposed to be yellow but almost looks white. I open the scanning software, choose the area of the scanning tray to scan, and then click the scan button. However, the older scanner I used to use at my parents' house, which gave much better image quality, was also a multifunction printer and I think it was an Epson but I'm not sure. Yes, my scanner is also a printer and a fax machine. Sorry, Discogs never notified me of this reply.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |